Blog

  • European Poetry Festival 2026–Romanian Poetry Night | | | | by Margento

    (A shorter version of this dispatch appeared on Asymptote‘s blog here)

    The ninth edition of the European Poetry Festival (London, UK, June-July 2026) involved exactly nine nations this year. Over 150 poets, many visiting from across Europe, presented new works at a series of “Camarade” events featuring poetry from Cyprus, Switzerland, Flanders, Estonia, Austria, Poland, Latvia, Norway, and Romania.

    The festival has been founded and directed, and in most respects, single-handedly operated over the past decade by awarded poet, academic, author, and performer SJ Fowler, who also documents the festival on YouTube and at multiple literary venues.

    Of the nine main features I only managed to attend the last, the Romanian poetry night at Poetry Society in Covent Garden on July 4th—-an event supported by RCI London and namely by their representative, poet, academic, and critic Gabriela Mocan. I was pleased to witness a prime illustration of Fowler’s trademark “camarade” concept that informs the entire festival. It involves pairing up each poet in the featured literature with one from a different background (British or other) and commissioning the resulting first-time duo to author and present a new collaborative/interactive work specially for the occasion.

    Simona Nastac and Livia Franchini kicked off the night by presenting what they (ironically) called a “tutorial” on how to make a peace poem 106 years after Tristan Tzara’s “How to Make a Dadaist Poem.” An impressive paraphernalia of props ranging from DIY tapestry to toy music instruments were deployed—-—including a baby’s guitar amusedly played by Franchini in Jimi Hendrix’s graphic style (to which my 11-year old exclaimed, “Yay, now move on to Jimmy Page’s explicit style”). This facetiously childish plea for peace was strewn with memorable appropriations of literary landmarks, such as, “Thought is made in the mouth” (one of Tzara’s famous dicta), except now stated after tasting a lollipop. Miruna Fulgeanu and Andra Simons tapped into another rich pool of Romanian heritage, fairy tales and folklore rather than Dadaism. Their transnational, posthuman, gender-transcending approach was rather in the spirit of another literary school with Romanian roots, absurdism. The audience was evidently mesmerized when Simons gradually transitioned from reading to singing and finally to a most genuine blues performance. Luminita Amarie and Tony White represented probably the best demonstration of Fowler’s camaraderie in the literal personal-political sense of the term. An intriguing contrast informed the (anti)dialogic reading in which Amarie hummed her introspective, personal lyric brevities while White, in a commanding voice, did a ‘British (fake) translation’ by reading from one of his acclaimed novels. Amarie’s intermittently Romanian fragments were thus juxtaposed with an implicitly scathing excerpt in which street clashes triggered cynical discourse about the safety of  riot police cracking down on demonstrators. Lastly, Margento and Nick Murray staged an intervention, tapping into Murray’s work on poetry gamification and tech that was leveraged in “astronomically” interacting with the other performer’s computational poetics and “monstrous moonshine” (i.e., algebraic-cosmological) intermediality.

    “Camaraderie” was further enacted by featuring non-Romanian poets/performers that made equally rich and daring contributions to the event. Matt Martin & Albert Pellicer performed an infectiously engaging and farcically erudite critique of Eurocentrism, while Richard Ettiger & Victor Rees did a lyrically merciless indictment of illegal detainment and torture as a Western-culture-packaged not-to-worry-about. Annabel Taylor & Eleanor Wilders contributed a brief and incisive shared stream-of-conscience poem of wandering troubled physicality and erosive-corrosive shoreline unindulgent reverie. Last but not least, Katarína Krupičková & SJ Fowler himself presented a literally acrobatic and erotically charged number while improvising a both mundane and surreal dialogue touching on performance of/as delusion—–a tangibly alienating place or condition—–at times effusive and bonding, though, if risky an encounter.

    If the Romanian evening was any indication, the European Poetry Festival continues to prove that its most enduring achievement lies not only in showcasing national poetries, but in creating genuinely new forms of dialogue—-of “camaraderie”—-between them.

  • Issue 0 — Editor’s Note | | | | Margento | | | |

    Magmatism. Mechanism? Immanentism? Monetism? Systemism? Magnificentism? Maga-ism? Ammunitionism? Anarchism? Nanoplastism? Mathy-Platonism? Dataist dadaism? Big-dada dataism? Big-brother amanuensism?


    Data is… not capta… Instead, we are the ones captured–contained, dissolved, and (re)molded–by its all‑consuming current. We are–and make together–ourselves complex-system data flows. That’s old news, yet blows out of proportion in Johanna Drucker‘s perspective. A vision, rather–literally. From the communication between (and cognition within) cells and tissue, to the vibration and–yes–light emitted by our brains, to the electromagnetism of beings and tech combined, to ubiquitous social media (telepathic) flows and cross-galactic entanglement, everything buzzes, resonates, and then roars in cosmo‑political, Whitmanesque‑paranoid, carnivalesquely erudite, and tragically exhilarating vistas. Salvador Dali’s prophetic yet hallucinatory artistic “method” and tenets, for example, even the whole of art (and literary) history, from Shakespeare to Bernadette Mayer, collapses into “a mere trifle in contrast to the hallucinations of the ever-emergent systems with which we are entangled.” Particularly when the latter are seen through Drucker’s World‑and‑Universe‑scale Webb telescope. The maddeningly panoramic picture of the pervasive “autopoiesis of stochastic systems” our culture consists of could have nvertheless only been captured by the long, meticulously polished mirrors of her own “stochastic poetics.”


    Our inability to grasp overwhelming (sublime?) magnitude and systemic emergence (in Drucker’s contribution) also prevents us from making space for the void. Blankness—-literal empty lines or “space”—-does not exist in the writing of computational language models. Large language models (LLMs) need tokens to process and generate any kind of data, and therefore blankness itself becomes just another token. Bruno Ministro, a long-standing practitioner of literary reading and criticism as interactive performance, chose to expose in his Blank Archive the paradoxical “absence of absence” that LLMs exhibit not through a conventional essay but through performance. His analytical-creative approach is thus politically relevant and effective and, since algorithmically sophisticated, also aesthetically intriguing. The misleading brevity of the machinic-poetic output not only ironically points to the models’ profit‑driven productivity and, thus, verbosity, but also inevitably–and intermedially–provides “evidence that algorithmic systems do not merely execute instructions; they stage interpretation through form.”


    Between those two scales lies a more intimate level: private reunion, ritual, and empathetic bonding. Emerging from the ongoing multimedia performance project ]sym.posion[, the work Table by the artist collective PartSuspended features a cross‑disciplinary video piece and a collage that invite both interactive participation and focused reflection. Visual metaphors, modern-oracular verse, and musical soundscapes steer the digital media toward an ethos that blends feminist elemental ecopoetics, a revived ancient communal spirit, understated sophistication, and serene resistance. In this context the “magmatic” quality is not about scale, it is not dynamically sublime (nor negatively so), and it is not computationally—-hence not politically-—pungent or explicit. Instead, it is the calm, welcoming “magma” of shared lived experience and eco‑care (“ecophilia”) that flows through/as postdigital performance.


    And then there is also the magma of improvization & defiance, the democracy of the jazz/rock (Gretchen Menn) solo and (Erin Manning’s) minor gesture, the camaraderie in performance and subversiveness at the European Poetry Festival. Thousands of poets have contributed over the years to the ever‑growing momentum for poetic collaboration. As evident–and compelling–in this candid testimonies and exchanges, that impetus has left an indelible imprint on poets and audiences alike and has sparked expansive networks of data-commoning and of ec(h)ophilic, autopoietic connectivity.

  • Welcome to Compoetics |||| by Margento ||||


    Welcome to

    Compoetics

    a journal dedicated to composition across media, systems, and thought, grounded in the shared space of

    Poetry <–> Computation <–> Communities.

    Compoetics brings together creative, computational, and critical practices through four interconnected sections:

    • Algorithmics / AI / LLMs / Repos / Databases
    • Intermedia / Transmedia / Performance
    • Text / Concrete / Intersemiotic
    • Theory / Essay / Criticism

    The journal is guided by the understanding that contemporary poetics unfolds across data/code/text, systems/embodiment/communities, and networked/dynamic/comparative reflection.

    Writing today may be (co-)generated, assisted, translated, transformed, performed, negotiated, archived, or theorized through technical and/or conceptual infrastructures–always situated within emerging/dynamic communities of (commoning) practice and exchange.

    Compoetics is a (data)space where poetry mediation and computation meet, and where communities (per)form and evolve around shared inquiry or work(s).

    Authors may be featured in one or more sections of a single issue through multifaceted contributions. A submission might include:

    • a literary work in the Text section,
    • a related or standalone trans/intermedia or videopoetic work in Intermedia,
    • a reflective or critical essay in Theory exploring (the) poetics (informing the submitted work), and/or
    • code, repository, or database in Algorithmics.

    Compoetics invites works that move between performance & archiving, between agents & field, between system & expression, between m(ist)aking & (re[s])thinking, between artifact and reflection, between (inter)platform and intermediation–and that contribute to an evolving ecology of poetic and computational communities.

    We look forward to compos(IT[u]action)ing with you.